Factors associated with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholangitis in patients undergoing endoscopic stone extraction at a Japanese tertiary care center
Abstract
Aim: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plays an important role in the management of patients with pancreaticobiliary disorders, including cholangitis. Although complications of ERCP can develop even when skilled physicians perform the procedure, there are few studies on the association between endoscopic stone extraction and post-ERCP cholangitis.
Materials and Methods: The present report is of a retrospective cohort study of patients with choledocholithiasis and post-ERCP cholangitis. Clinical, microbiological, and procedural data were collected from the patients’ electronic medical records. The relationship between each clinical feature and post-ERCP cholangitis was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: Of 376 patients with acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis, 200 consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Among these, 23 (11.5%) received the diagnosis of post-ERCP cholangitis. In multivariate analysis, a duration of ≥11 days from biliary drainage to endoscopic stone extraction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 8.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.68-27.50) and the use of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (aOR 6.04; 95% CI, 1.88-19.40) were identified as independent risk factors of post-ERCP cholangitis.
Conclusions: The risk of post-ERCP cholangitis can be reduced by performing endoscopic stone extraction as soon as the patient achieves clinical stability after biliary stent insertion and by using endoscopic sphincterotomy instead of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation.
Keywords
References
Talukdar R. Complications of ERCP. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology 2016;30(5):793–805
Chen M, Wang L, Wang Y, Wei W, Yao YL, Ling TS, et al. Risk factor analysis of post-ERCP cholangitis: A single-center experience. Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International 2018;17(1):55–58
Thompson AM, Wright DJ, Murray W, Ritchie GL, Burton HD, Stonebridge PA. Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: Room for improvement? Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2004;18(1):22–25
Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017;85(1):32–47
Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Biliary tract diseases in the elderly: Management and outcomes. Gut 1997;41: 433-435
Lee D, Ahn YJ, Lee HW, Chung JK, Jung IM. Prevalence and characteristics of clinically significant retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2016;91(5):239-246
Gigot JF, Leese T, Dereme T, Coutinho J, Castaing D, Bismuth H. Acute cholangitis. Multivariate analysis of risk factors. Annals of Surgery 1989;209(4):435–438
Kimura Y, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gouma DJ, Garden OJ, et al. TG13 current terminology, etiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 2013;20(1):8–23
Tagashira Y, Sakamoto N, Isogai T, Hikone M, Kosaka A, Chino R, et al. Impact of inadequate initial antimicrobial therapy on mortality in patients with bacteraemic cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2017;23(10):740–747
Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gabata T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 2018;25(1):17–30
Scheithauer BK, Wos-Oxley ML, Ferslev B, Jablonowski H, Pieper DH. Characterization of the complex bacterial communities colonizing biliary stents reveals a host-dependent diversity. ISME Journal 2009;3(7):797–807
Basioukas P, Vezakis A, Zarkotou O, Fragulidis G, Themeli-Digalaki K, Rizos S, et al. Isolated microorganisms in plastic biliary stents placed for benign and malignant diseases. Annals of Gastroenterology 2014;27(4):399–403
Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, Arvanitakis M, Bories E, Costamagna G, et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016;48:657–683
Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, MacMathuna P, Petersen BT, Jaffe PE, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 2004;127(5):1291–1299
Zhao HC, He L, Zhou DC, Geng XP, Pan FM. Meta-analysis comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;19(24):3883–3891
Chang WH, Chu CH, Wang TE, Chen MJ, Lin CC. Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2005;11(4):593–6
Liao WC, Lee CT, Chang CY, Leung JW, Chen JH, Tsai MC, et al. Randomized trial of 1-minute versus 5-minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2010;72(6):1154–1162
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.